GroundTruth Conflict Feed
A neutral, source-ranked conflict news feed that strips propaganda from official statements and tells you what's actually verified vs. claimed.
journalists, researchers, and informed citizens trying to follow the Iran-US conflict without getting played by any one side
- Side-by-side claim comparison: Iran's claim vs. US claim vs. independently verified evidence (BBC Verify, AP, Reuters)
- Source-credibility scoring that learns over time which outlets in this conflict are most often right vs. propaganda
- Daily verified-only digest (no claims, only what satellites, on-the-ground reporters, and OSINT confirm)
- Exportable evidence packs with source links and timestamps for journalists filing copy
BBC Verify explicitly verified some damage while denying Iranian claims of civilian infrastructure hits; the public wants the same kind of verification for ongoing strikes, not just one-off fact-checks.
Active Iran-US strikes drive sustained news interest; fact-check fatigue is realBBC Verify | Latest News & Updates | BBC News ↗
Most conflict aggregators are editorialized; few do claim-vs-evidence side-by-side in real timeBBC Verify | Latest News & Updates | BBC News ↗
Journalists and researchers pay for tools (Pinpoint, FT, ProQuest); consumer version can be ad-supportedBBC Verify | Latest News & Updates | BBC News ↗
Conflict-driven need is cyclical; the broader 'source-ranked feed' need is permanent
LLM-based claim extraction plus source ranking is technically tractable; main work is editorial curation