EdrTruth
A continuous blue-team validation platform that replays curated offensive technique libraries (io_uring, eBPF, audit-kill, BPF-LSM detach, kprobe unhooking) against a customer's own environment to verify their EDR actually detects modern evasion.
SOC analysts, detection engineers, and security leads at mid-market and enterprise companies who need empirical evidence their EDR stack catches modern evasion
- scheduled red-team emulation library mapped to MITRE ATT&CK technique IDs
- evasion-technique regression suite run inside the customer's own environment to test real EDR coverage
- dashboard showing detection coverage over time with regression alerts when a rule stops firing
- exportable evidence pack for compliance audits and board-level reporting
Open-source offensive tooling like Furtex is publicly documenting io_uring and eBPF bypasses that sidestep traditional syscall-table EDR hooks. Most blue teams have no empirical way to confirm whether their stack actually sees these — they find out the hard way.
Established BAS/EDR-validation category exists (AttackIQ, Cymulate, SCYTHE, Picus) with explicit demand for 'continuous EDR effectiveness verification,' but the specific Linux-modern-evasion niche is nascent and the cited HN trend had only 4 points.Which breach and attack simulation vendors are considered the gold standard for validating EDR effectiveness? ↗AttackIQ Enterprise ↗
BAS/continuous validation market is crowded with well-funded incumbents (AttackIQ 3,000+ scenarios, Cymulate, SCYTHE, SafeBreach, Picus, Pentera, Adaptive Security); Linux-specific io_uring/eBPF evasion is a narrow emerging angle rather than open territory.Buyer's guide: Breach and attack simulation (BAS) tools ↗Top 5 Breach and Attack Simulation Tools Compared ↗
Buyers pay six-figure annual sums for BAS (AttackIQ positioned as premium, Cymulate as cost-efficient per PeerSpot), proving willingness to pay — but a Linux-niche entrant typically gets squeezed on price and must justify itself against incumbents bundling similar content.AttackIQ vs Cymulate (2026) - PeerSpot ↗AWS Marketplace: AttackIQ ↗
Attack/defense cat-and-mouse is permanent and Linux server/workload detection is growing with cloud adoption, but EDR vendors (CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Elastic) are themselves adding coverage for io_uring/eBPF abuse, which steadily erodes the value of a third-party validator for these specific techniques.New Linux Rootkits Leverage Advanced eBPF and io_uring Techniques ↗Furtex Emerges as a Powerful Linux Post-Exploitation Toolkit ↗
Replay of rootkit/evasion techniques (BPF-LSM detach, kprobe unhooking, audit-kill) against customer prod environments is intrinsically dangerous, requires deep kernel expertise and tight safety rails, and creates a heavy per-customer support/onboarding burden.Furtex - Linux Toolkit for Post-Exploitation and Evasion ↗Inside Furtex: A Linux Toolkit Built to Stay Close to the Kernel ↗